Articles and Reports

• 2019
• 2018
• 2017
• 2016
• 2015
• 2014
• 2013
• 2008 – 2012

2020

Kaiser, Kathryn A.; Chodacki, John; Habermann, Ted; Kemp, Jennifer; Paglione, Laura; Urberg, Michelle; Scott Plutchak, T. (2020) Metadata: The accelerant we need, IOS Press, 10.3233/ISU-200094,

2019

Lowenberg, D, Chodacki, J, Fenner, M, Kemp, J, Jones, MB. (2019). Open Data Metrics: Lighting the Fire (Version 1). Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3525349 

Cousjin, H, Feeney, P, Lowenberg, D, Presani, E, Simons, M.  (2109).  Bringing Citations and Usage Metrics Together to Make Data Count. Data Science Journal, 18(1), p. 9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2019-009

Gregg WJ, Erdmann C, Paglione LAD, Schneider J, Dean C. (2019). “A literature review of scholarly communications metadata.” Research Ideas and Outcomes 5: e38698. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.5.e38698

Martinez, PA, Erdmann, C, Simons, N, et al.  (2019). “Top 10 Data & Software Things.” Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3409968.

2018

• Ten principles for machine-actionable data management plans. PLOS ComputationalBiology (preprint available on Zenodo http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1434938). Co-authored by Tomasz Miksa, Stephanie Simms, Daniel Mietchen, and Sarah Jones.2018 A Landscape Survey of #ActiveDMPs. International Journal of Digital Curation13(1): 204-214.https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v13i1.629 (Open Access). Co-authored by Stephanie Simms, Sarah Jones, Tomasz Miksa, Daniel Mietchen, Natasha Simons,and Kathryn Unsworth.
• Abrams, S, “Nothing succeeds like success: An approach for evaluating digital preservation efficacy,” iPRES 2018, The 15th International Conference on Digital Preservation, Boston, September 24-27, 2018 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8cp160c9
• Abrams, S, “Theorizing success: Measures for evaluating digital preservation efficacy,” JCDL 2018, Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Fort Worth, June 3-6, 2018 https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xt368b2
• Borghi, J, Abrams, S, Lowenberg, D., Sims, S, and Chodacki, J. “Support your data: A research data management guide for researchers,” RIO 4: e26439 https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.4.e26439
• Fenner, M, Lowenberg, D, Jone, M, Needham, P, Vieglais, D, Abrams, S, Cruse, P, and Chodacki, J, Code of Practice for Research Data Usage Metrics, release 1, COUNTER https://peerj.com/preprints/26505/

• Kemp, J, Dean, C, Chodacki, J.  (2018) “Can Richer Metadata Rescue Research?”, The Serials Librarian, 74:1-4, 207-211, DOI: 10.1080/0361526X.2018.1428483 

• Chodacki, J, Cruse, P, Lin, J, Neylon, C, Pattinson, D, Strasser, C. (2018). Supporting Research Communications: A guide (Version v1.1). Zenodo. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3524663

• Burton, M, Lyon, L, Erdmann, C, Tijerina, B.  (2018).  “Shifting to Data Savvy: The Future of Data Science In Libraries.”  Project Report. University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.   

2017

• Machine-actionable data management plans (maDMPs). Research Ideas and Outcomes3: e13086. https://doi.org/10.3897/rio.3.e13086 (Open Access). Co-authored by Stephanie R Simms, Sarah Jones, Daniel Mietchen, and Tomasz Miksa.
• Next-Generation Data Management Plans: Global, Machine-Actionable, FAIR.International Journalof Digital Curation 12(1). https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v12i1.513 (OpenAccess). Co-authored by Stephanie R Simms and Sarah Jones.

2016

• The Future of Data Management Planning: Tools, Policies, and Players. International Journal of Digital Curation. Co-authored by Stephanie Simms, Sarah Jones, Marisa Strong, and Marta Ribeiro. https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.413
• Abrams S, Goethals A, Klein M, Lack R, Cobweb: A Collaborative Collection Development Platform for Web Archiving. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8760. doi:10.3897/rio.2.e8760
• Abrams S, Katz J, Simms S, Strong M, and Willett P. Dash: Data sharing made easy at the University of California. 11th International Digital Curation Conference. Amsterdam, Netherlands. International Journal of Digital Curation 11(1): 118-127 https://doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v11i1.408
• Simms S, Jones S, Strong M, and Ribeiro, M. The future of data management planning: Tools, policies, and players. 11th International Digital Curation Conference. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
• Simms S, Jones S, Ashley K, Ribeiro M, Chodacki J, Abrams S, Strong M, Roadmap: A Research Data Management Advisory Platform. Research Ideas and Outcomes 2: e8649. doi: 10.3897/rio.2.e8649

2015

• Abrams, S. A foundational framework for digital curation: The Sept domain model. iPRES 2015, The 12th International Conference on Digital Preservation. UC Office of the President (2015). Retrieved from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/75v3z67n
• Abrams, S. Rising from firm foundations. D-Lib Magazine 22, no.3/4 (2015) http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march15/03inbrief.html
• Kratz J, Strasser C (2015). Researcher Perspectives on Publication and Peer Review of Data. PLoS ONE 10(2): e0117619. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0117619.
• Kratz, J., and Strasser, C. (2015). Making data count. 2. (150039). Scientific Data, 2. doi:10.1038/sdata.2015.39
• Kratz, J., and Strasser, C. (2015). Making Data Count survey response. http://dx.doi.org/10.5060/d8h59d/
• Starr J, Castro E, Crosas M, Dumontier M, Downs RR, Duerr R, Haak L, Haendel M, Herman I, Hodson S, Hourclé J, Kratz JE, Lin J, Nielsen LH, Nurnberger A, Pröll S, Rauber A, Sacchi S, Smith AP, Taylor M, Clark T. (2015) Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications. PeerJ PrePrints 3: https://peerj.com/preprints/697v3/

2014

• Abrams, S, Cruse, P, Strasser, C, Willet P,, Boushey, G, Kochi, J, Laurance, M, and Rizk-Jackson, A. “DataShare: Empowering Researcher Data Curation.” International Journal of Digital Curation 9, no. 1 (2014): 110-118. http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/9.1.110/345
• Kratz JE and Strasser C. “Data Publication Consensus and Controversies.” F1000Research, no. 3 (2014): 94. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4097345/pdf/f1000research-3-5878.pdf
• Strasser, C, Kunze, J, Abrams, S and Cruse, P. DataUp: A tool to help researchers describe and share tabular data [version 2; referees: 2 approved]. F1000Research 2014, 3:6 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.3-6.v2
• Strasser, C, Cruse, P, and Abrams, S. (2014). Dash: Improving Community Repositories for Better Data Sharing. UC Office of the President: California Digital Library. Retrieved from: http://eprints.cdlib.org/uc/item/2mw6v93b
• Strasser, C, Abrams, S, and Cruse, P. ” DMPTool 2: Expanding Functionality for Better Data Management Planning.” International Journal of Digital Curation 9, no. 1 (2014): 324-330. http://www.ijdc.net/index.php/ijdc/article/view/9.1.324/361

2013

• Abrams, S, Wittman, N, Rizk-Jackson, A, and Kochi, J. “Sharing Data-Rich Research through Repository Layering,” Open Repositories, 8-12 July 2013, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada

2008-2012

• Abrams, S, Kunze, J, and Loy, D, “An Emergent Micro-Services Approach to Digital Curation Infrastructure,” iPRES 2009: the Sixth International Conference on Preservation of Digital Objects. Proceedings, 4-11. Also “An Emergent Micro-Services Approach to Digital Curation Infrastructure,” International Journal of Digital Curation 5:1 (2010) 172-186.
• Abrams, S, Morrissey, S, and Cramer, T, “‘What? So what?’: The Next-Generation JHOVE2 Architecture for Format-Aware Characterization,” International Journal of Digital Curation 4:3 (2009) 123-136.
• Abrams, S, Cruse, P, and Kunze, J, “Preservation is Not a Place.” International Journal of Digital Curation, 4:1 (2009): 8-21.
• Stephen Abrams, Patricia Cruse, John Kunze, and David Minor (2011), “Curation micro-services: A pipeline metaphor for repositories,” Journal of Digital Information 12.2 https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/1605/1766
• Cruse, Patricia and Beth Sandore. “The Library of Congress National Digital Information Infrastructure and Preservation Program.” Library Trends, 57:3 (2009): 301-314. [Find it at your library]
• Kunze, J, Cruse, P, Hu, R, et al. “Practices, Trends, and Recommendations in Technical Appendix Usage for Selected Data-Intensive Disciplines.” Report for the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. (Nov 2010).
• Michener, W, Cruse, P, Kunze, J, at al. “DataONE: Data Observation Network for Earth – Preserving Data and Enabling Innovation in the Biological and Environmental Sciences.” D-Lib Magazine, 17:1/2 (Jan/Feb 2011).
• Seneca, T. “The Web-at-Risk at Three: Overview of an NDIIPP Web Archiving Initiative.” Library Trends, 57:3 (2009): 427-441. [Find it at your library]
• Seneca, T. “Whither the Web: How Libraries can Preserve Our Digital Cultural Heritage,” In: Deidre Irwin Ross (Ed.), Issues in Librarianship: Presented Papers at the ALA 2008 Annual Conference. Chicago: American Library Association, 2008. [Find it at your library]
• Starr, J, Willett, P, Federer, L, Horning, C, and Bergstrom, ML. “A Collaborative Framework for Data Management Services: The Experience of the University of California,” Journal of eScience Librarianship: 1:2 (2012):109-114.doi:10.7191/jeslib.2012.1014
• Starr, J. “isCitedBy: A Metadata Scheme for DataCite,” D-Lib Magazine, 17:1/2 (Jan/Feb 2011).
• Willett, P. “Mass Digitization and its Impact on Interlending and Document Supply,” Interlending and Document Supply 37:3 (2009): 143-148. [Find it at your library]